A brand new scathing report about Tesla simply got here out in China. It describes how the automaker is turning into trigger-happy, suing its personal clients and the media whereas auto journalists are being advised to not be adverse in regards to the American automaker.
To today, Tesla is the one overseas automaker with a wholly-owned automotive manufacturing unit in China, though Toyota is predicted to observe in a number of years.
Elon Musk made the deal occur with Chinese language Communist Get together (CCP) officers again in 2018. Tesla Gigafactory Shanghai turned the corporate’s greatest manufacturing hub and its greatest income and revenue.
Tesla would by no means be the place it’s at this time with out Gigafactory Shanghai and the Chinese language market.
Now, we be taught that Tesla is keen to go to nice lengths to guard that.
The Related Press (AP) has simply launched a captivating in-depth report about Tesla’s actions in China relating to clients and the media.
The report facilities round a brand new perspective on the extremely publicized battle between Tesla and one in all its Chinese language clients who claimed a brake defect, nevertheless it additionally goes deeper by highlighting a shit in Tesla’s method to criticism in China.
AP discovered that Tesla sued “at the very least six automotive homeowners in China who had sudden car malfunctions, high quality complaints or accidents they claimed had been brought on by mechanical failures.”
Tesla additionally sued “at the very least six bloggers and two Chinese language media shops that wrote critically in regards to the firm.”
That is extremely uncommon habits for an automaker.
The report additionally highlights the shut relationship between Tesla and CCP officers, particularly Li Qiang, the previous social gathering boss of Shanghai who’s now China’s premier. He was concerned within the Gigafactory Shanghai deal.
It’s not information that Tesla benefited from preferential therapy in China, however the report goes fairly a bit additional.
AP alleges that native media are instructed to not be adverse on Tesla:
Tesla has profited from the largesse of the Chinese language state, profitable unprecedented regulatory advantages, below-market fee loans and enormous tax breaks. With a number of pointed exceptions, Tesla has loved largely ingratiating protection within the Chinese language press, and journalists advised AP they’ve been instructed to keep away from adverse protection of the automaker.
A reporter advised AP:
“We had been advised by our editor that we should always not write negatively about Tesla as a result of it’s a key firm that was launched and guarded by the Shanghai authorities.”
The report additionally explains how Tesla wins about 90% of the courtroom instances filed in opposition to the automaker by clients who declare a defect.
Many shoppers complained of Tesla’s lack of communication, resulting in submitting lawsuits.
In the event that they file lawsuits, they lose, and in the event that they complain publicly, they’re those getting sued by Tesla and compelled to pay the corporate and make a public apology.
Electrek’s Take
That’s fairly a report. It gave a brand new perspective on Ms. Zhang’s case. Her case made it to Western media in 2021-2022, however by no means with the extent of element on this report.
The info are she bought into an accident. She claimed it was as a result of a brake failure. Tesla claimed it was as a result of a driver mistake.
She felt compelled to protest Tesla over what she noticed as a severe security difficulty. She was fairly persistent with it. Tesla sued her and received as a result of she had no option to show {that a} brake defect had brought about the accident. She was compelled to pay Tesla and make a public apology.
However we additionally realized that Tesla claimed that different entities had been backing her regardless of no proof of that by any means.
I feel there’s room for reflection on Tesla’s half right here. Is that this what it desires to be: an organization that sues its clients and media over criticism?
Like some clients mentioned within the report, Tesla might have prevented a lot that by merely having higher communications with clients.
FTC: We use revenue incomes auto affiliate hyperlinks. Extra.
