14.3 C
New York
Tuesday, April 15, 2025

Why Ferrari did not push for George Russell’s penalty: clues in Charles Leclerc’s onboard?


On the chequered flag of the Bahrain Grand Prix, George Russell’s Mercedes finishes in second place, however the Briton’s result’s shaky. Automotive #63 was actually famous by the stewards for having opened the DRS at a time when it wasn’t allowed and should face a prolonged dialogue with FIA stewards to make clear the incident. The one who may gain advantage from a attainable penalty for George Russell is Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc, who crossed the end line only a few seconds behind the Brit. But, within the post-race part, the Prancing Horse didn’t push for a sanction in opposition to the rival driver: why?

Comfortable Ferrari: no stress for a George Russell penalty
Formulation One is, as we all know, the head of motorsport competitors, and each element could make the distinction. At the beginning of a season nonetheless with none podiums, many have been shocked by the politically passive angle of the Maranello group concerning the potential penalty for George Russell, which might have delivered Leclerc’s first podium of 2025. Within the post-race interview with Sky Italia, Ferrari group principal Fred Vasseur even downplayed what occurred with the Mercedes driver. “He misplaced the transponder so we had neither the info nor the GPS. I believe it was his mistake, however I don’t suppose they’ll penalise him as a result of the benefit was actually small.”

Then nothing extra. Nobody from the Ferrari storage raised their voice to try to seize the season’s first podium after the race. Following a protracted dialogue after the occasion, the Federation determined to show a blind eye to the Russell episode, after verifying Mercedes’s technical difficulties and the minimal benefit gained by the Brit.

Not simply George Russell: DRS additionally opened for Charles Leclerc
To seek out a solution for Ferrari’s lack of “stress” in direction of the FIA stewards, it might be helpful to think about two episodes: a group radio from Charles Leclerc and an onboard shot from the Monegasque’s SF-25. Russell wasn’t the one one to open the DRS at a forbidden second. Charles Leclerc himself, seemingly as a consequence of the transponder concern with the Mercedes forward of him, opened the rear wing for a fraction of a second whereas going via a nook. Noticing this anomaly, the Monegasque promptly requested his engineer Bryan Bozzi: “What the hell occurred? Why do I’ve the DRS lively?” The engineer’s reply was clear: “There was an issue with the transponders, use the DRS solely after I inform you.”

The anomalous DRS opening on automobile #16 was additionally captured by one of many onboard cameras on the SF-25. From the rear-facing digital camera, which was monitoring an attacking Lando Norris, you possibly can clearly see Leclerc’s DRS all of a sudden open in flip 12.

Did Ferrari keep away from “pushing” the stewards to keep away from an investigation into Charles Leclerc? Or, contemplating the seemingly connection between the 2 incidents, ought to the Italian group have tried to exert some type of “political stress” on the FIA?

— see video above —-

Why Ferrari didn't push for George Russell’s penalty: clues in Charles Leclerc’s onboard? | F1 Bahrain GP

Supply: f1ingenerale

David Carter

Purchase official Ferrari F1 merchandise!

Let different Scuderia Followers find out about us

Pin Share



Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles