The Japanese Grand Prix, identical to the 2 earlier rounds of the 2025 Method 1 championship (the final beneath the technical laws launched in 2022), proved as soon as once more to be missing in pleasure. Carlos Sainz‘s feedback after the race, when he in contrast the Suzuka circuit to Monaco for the impossibility of overtaking, ought to immediate reflection. There have been only a few overtakes, however what occurred at Suzuka isn’t an remoted case. Many variables affect a Grand Prix: tyres are taking part in an more and more central function, as are circuit layouts, asphalt grip, technical directives, and the broad efficiency gaps between groups. Nevertheless, the basis subject stays the vehicles themselves.
Did the 2022 laws fail?
When the 2022 laws have been launched, the target was clear: permit drivers to observe one another extra intently and enhance overtaking alternatives by lowering sensitivity to the soiled air produced by vehicles in entrance. The 2022 vehicles, actually, simplified in form and designed to generate most of their aerodynamic load by way of floor impact by way of the ground, have been alleged to launch a cleaner and fewer turbulent wake of air in comparison with the previous.
However the query arises: did the FIA actually reach its purpose? The reply, not less than in the present day, is unfavourable. But, firstly of this new regulatory period, a slight enchancment had been noticed. Nevertheless, because the seasons progressed, the on-track spectacle step by step diminished. Why?
The reply lies in technical evolution. The vehicles have improved exponentially when it comes to efficiency in comparison with 2022, and with that has come elevated reliance on aerodynamics. Consequently, clear air has develop into ever extra important for the right functioning of aerodynamic parts. When a automotive is within the slipstream of one other, it enters a zone of turbulent air that compromises aerodynamic effectivity, lowering downforce and thus cornering pace. This will increase tyre stress, as they start to degrade quicker because of the lack of aerodynamic grip. So, the extra performant and aerodynamically environment friendly a automotive is, the extra it suffers when disadvantaged of fresh air.
The problem of Method 1
Sadly, this may stay a everlasting limitation of Method 1: at sure speeds, the slipstream will all the time exist, and regardless of how a lot work is completed to scale back sensitivity to soiled air, its results can by no means be fully eradicated. It’s a paradox that makes this sport each fascinating and problematic. The vehicles are extraordinarily advanced, and behind each are engineers pushing the bounds of their information, usually discovering gray areas within the laws. It’s exactly these gray areas which have allowed groups to introduce completely authorized options that go in opposition to the spirit of the FIA laws, widening the efficiency hole between groups and forcing the federation to continuously replace the technical guidelines.
The issue lies in the truth that, by exploiting gray areas of the principles, engineers have managed to emulate ideas banned by the brand new laws, equivalent to using aerodynamic vortices, which since 2022 have been minimized with a view to clear up the air wake.
The way forward for Method 1
As talked about, Method 1 is the product of the good minds of engineers who push each attainable idea to the intense, making it probably the most fascinating racing class. Because of this, one attainable answer may very well be the standardization of a very good portion of parts throughout all groups, however that may be a serious blow to a sport that has constructed its power on innovation and experimentation.
Lately, these issues and attainable options have been extensively mentioned: the shortcomings of the present vehicles are well-known and never few. The FIA has additionally stepped in, drafting a brand new set of technical laws for 2026. Nevertheless, solely once we see the brand new vehicles on observe will we be capable of really assess the effectiveness of those decisions, which at the moment nonetheless elevate many questions. The concept behind the 2022 laws was not totally incorrect, but it surely was probably poorly managed and, in mild of the outcomes, can now be seen as a missed alternative—if not an outright failure.
That doesn’t imply that there received’t be thrilling races in 2025: there shall be, simply as there have been in previous seasons. Typically due to beneficial circuits, different occasions because of sudden occasions, incidents, or unpredictable conditions. Nevertheless, Method 1 can not and should not rely solely on exterior components to ensure leisure.

Comparability between the wake launched by a current-generation automotive and a previous-generation automotive – supply: f1ingenerale
Supply: f1ingenerale