Annually in Barcelona, Pirelli brings the toughest compounds in its vary as a result of the high-speed corners, which switch a variety of power to the tyres, the excessive temperatures, and aggressive asphalt require extra resistant rubber. That was the case once more this season, but there’s one thing curious and “uncommon”: the toughest compounds don’t appear to be working, to the good thing about the softer ones.
It nearly appears paradoxical, as a result of each on single laps and over lengthy distances, the gentle tyre has confirmed to be the very best compound amongst these introduced by Pirelli to Barcelona—a lot in order that it’s anticipated for use in two separate stints, alternated with a more durable compound, similar to in 2024.
This results in an fascinating consideration: why has the arduous not managed to be efficient, to the purpose that groups already discarded a set throughout FP1? It’s logical to assume that, with this selection, the groups had been already conscious that the toughest compound wouldn’t be very aggressive, and the development seems to observe what has been seen up to now.
As a result of its structure, the Barcelona monitor requires reasonably vital compromises—not a lot (or not solely) when it comes to balancing gradual and high-speed corners, however particularly in how the 2 axles are managed. The numerous fast corners, excessive temperatures, and one of the aggressive surfaces of the season push groups to decide on fastidiously which axle to prioritise.
An excessive amount of understeer, in an effort to guard the rear tyres, finally ends up destroying the front-left in high-speed corners, like flip 3 or the ultimate two quick corners of the third sector. However, if the setup focuses on defending the entrance to scale back understeer, the danger turns into extreme stress on the rear tyres. This can doubtless be a key theme for the race and it is going to be fascinating to watch how the monitor evolves as soon as extra rubber is laid down.
Simone Berra from Pirelli defined that thermal degradation originates from traction zones—primarily these after the primary chicane, after flip 5, and after flip 10—that are essentially the most vital factors for traction. He confirmed how advanced it’s to search out the fitting stability between the entrance and rear axles.
As for the entrance, he famous that it’s particularly overloaded in flip 3, which is a really lengthy nook. The front-left tyre is extra closely loaded than the rear-left, which ends up in excessive temperatures even on the entrance axle. Due to this fact, it’s primarily a matter of conserving the temperature low on each axles.
It was no coincidence that many groups had been seen experimenting yesterday to search out the fitting stability between entrance and rear, with wing modifications (as within the case of McLaren) or a extra unstable rear finish, as seen on Purple Bull and Ferrari, who will definitely intention to right this, particularly for qualifying.
Discovering this stability proved much more troublesome with the C1 arduous tyre, which gives much less mechanical grip and tends to slip extra, triggering overheating and additional lowering traction. Maybe a extra rubbered-in monitor may assist, however on Friday it was the worst-performing compound of the three—particularly contemplating that this 12 months the C2 has been introduced nearer to the C3 when it comes to efficiency.
Certainly, throughout the first session, a number of drivers—together with Lewis Hamilton—instantly reported how little grip the toughest compound provided, each on single laps (which wasn’t a shock) and over lengthy runs. Realistically, groups had already predicted this state of affairs in pre-weekend simulations, additionally primarily based on historic knowledge, which is why they discarded it instantly in FP1.
Simone Berra added that the C1 struggles with sliding, which creates vital overheating and thus poor tempo. On paper, it’s the most thermally resistant tyre. Nevertheless, the Italian famous that it doesn’t handle to generate grip on the asphalt, so the race tempo merely doesn’t materialise.
Unsurprisingly, Pirelli believes that the technique most prime groups ought to observe is gentle/medium/gentle, though surprises may come up—like in final 12 months’s race, when an early pit cease led to a extra inventive technique. Moreover, the gentle tyre firstly ought to provide additional grip, which is useful given the lengthy straight heading into flip 1 and the significance of avoiding soiled air within the early laps.
Simone Berra defined that, from Pirelli’s perspective, the C3 and C2 are very comparable. He acknowledged that the C3 is an effective race tyre and that, since degradation is excessive, if there isn’t a pointy drop in efficiency—if front-left put on doesn’t attain 100%—and the tyres will be managed correctly, then the C3 turns into an excellent long-run possibility. On an extended stint, he famous, its tempo was fairly just like the C2.
The Italian additionally added that this was one thing they noticed final 12 months too, so that they had been not likely shocked. Furthermore, this 12 months the C2 and C3 are even nearer, since final 12 months’s C2 had much less grip and thus struggled extra, just like the C1. Against this, this 12 months’s C2 affords extra grip and is nearer to the C3.
Purchase official Ferrari F1 merchandise!
Let different Scuderia Followers find out about us
